Will the USA attack Iran?

yahoo-addicts · BizHat Newbie Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Posts: 8

i think that the us will invade iran but not now we need to get out of iraq

Guest · Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:53 am Post subject:

Does america have the military capacity to occupy Iraq at the same time as invading iran? I think they would be over stretched.

Do they have the right to threaten Iran for developing a technology when they themselves are the only country to actively use the technology in war?

I wonder if the US would consider tactical air strikes, in order to subdue Iran. I think it would be political suicide for George, but so was invading Iraq. Has he learnt from his mistakes?

garybristow · Guest

Everybody seems to care about the oil. There is plenty of this stuff. It is all around. Under my feet under your feet. The oil companies do a good job in making people believe it is precious. They only spend so much each year for new sites.

It's like housing in major cities. The builders choose to build below the growth rate. So they don't have to worry about competition, and get a great primium. Basically all these major industries have an illegal agrement to not compete.

So for saying all that, I know we will not go to war with Iran. Only for the fact that 5% of the people rule the government and the other 95% want them gone. Every other government knows this, and is just waiting for the day when a group of college students pick up some guns and start kidnapping people. The way Iran's current government was founded 30 years ago.

nishant.bizhat.com · BizHat Newbie Joined: 29 Sep 2005 Posts: 18

As far as the topic concerns,developments in recent past have been rather pointing against such a possibility.Moreover,US knows if Iran is attacked,situatino will not work in its favour.India voted against Iran fine but it had a purpose.In event of US attacking Iran,sure they'll loose much ado and relation they are developing with India.Now as far as other perspective is concerned,US has lost Iraq like Vietnam.I mean fine they had Saddam,but they are loosing soldiers at considerable rate as they were in Vietnam war.Their Vietnam ghost has revisited them.Iraq turned pout to be different than Afghanistan which they never expected and realised.Now Iran is much advanced than Iraq.So,questino is how effective will US be if it were to face another such situation .Already a vietnam like situation in Iraq and face even worse in Iran would be just too much.Also,it won't risk inviting Muslim enemity for itself.Iran is a gateway to that region and it will be more than what US would ever want,atleast at present time.

fartinmonkey · BizHat Newbie Joined: 04 Jan 2005 Posts: 15

How do you feel about having a man lead your counrty in to battle because he says god instructed him to do it?

The leader of america HAS to be impartial to religon! Do you think this could turn it to a religious war?

James Lynes
www.fartinmonkey.co.uk

Guest · Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:37 pm Post subject:

Ok..George W. might attack iran...but if he doesn't....he SHOULD...As part of the "War on Terror" We treat terrorist harboring countries as Terrorists themselves...We ALL KNOW Iran has terrorists in their country...so we MUST go after them...And for the post about Clinton being better...pshhhh...Why do you think jobs are so scarce?...What caused all these economic problems for the U.S...Wasn't Bush...Was that BS NAFTA That Clinton decided to put in...Worst mistake by a U.S. president EVER In My Opinion....That's my reasons...I'm open to hearing the other side and I sure hope I do

jmunsters · Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject:

Syria will be first since we have more to go on with them as a terrorist state. They are the ones being fingered for the Libya assisination, the flooding of insurgents into Iraq and Israel, etc.

Iran may be stubborn, but they're don't hold a candle next to an oil field as much as Syria does.

FlOw · BizHat Newbie Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 9

Hey if we can go attack Iraq for nothing... who the hell is going to stop us from destroying Iran?

solksjaer15 · BizHat MOD Joined: 17 Jun 2005 Posts: 4204

FlOw · BizHat Newbie Joined: 15 Nov 2005 Posts: 9

Okay Hippy... Laughing

elci · BizHat Newbie Joined: 12 Dec 2005 Posts: 10

I don't believe that the U.S. will attack Iran as long as George W. Bush is president.

Regardless if you feel that invading Iraq was right or wrong, it's probably not financially possible for the United States to start another war in the world, an it would be quite risky.

Guest · Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 12:38 pm Post subject:

When the bombs hit Iran, World War 3 will probably be underway.

crazybg · BizHat Newbie Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 10

Yes , but I don't know why USA continue to atack countries like Iraq !?

CFE · BizHat Geek Joined: 19 Aug 2004 Posts: 1144 Location: USA

we're already in a great finaiancial loss.

We're still paying Japan for what we did in WWII.
Clinton was a good president, he tried to decrease our National debt, because if japan wanted, they can come over to usa and say your so far in debt with us we will buy your country and all its legislations. So then we would be called New Japan or something gay like that, thats something bush and all the other countries had chosen to forget.

crazybobi · BizHat Newbie Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 6

I don't know .... USA is improvident country . I hope no !