Originally Posted by
http://neerajsingh.bizhat
Similarly, not only I anyone can quote so many instances from their history, culture, religion that would support one point of view wherein we can distinguish between a suicide and self-sacrifice for some good reasons and NOT for personal gains.[/color]
Thank's for impresive lesson in India's history, especialy in Sanskrit (one of ours academician claims that our own language was evolved from Sanskrit).
I'm also very glad to see that you was courteous to find some facts about our (Serb's) history. In the same time, I must say that Slavenko Terzic is very competent authority, but also a little bit one-sided. He was a expert witness in the Slobodan Milosevic's trial, proffer
by the defender, for the exapmle.
I agree that is always a good mutual reason for self-sacrifising. It comes in selfdestruction, but also in destruction of as many enemies as possible. There is an heroe's conscience of impossibility to win the victory, but the belief in benefit (for the others, for the fatherland...) of the battle is not necessary the element of their thoughts; on the contrary, they would self-sacrifised themselves in the absence of any positive effect of theirs deeds (deads) or despite that.
I'm wondering the personal reasons which propel that men to do what they were did, because I beleve that every man have his own intimate background.
That's my point.
Please, don't understand my posts as attempt to negate your's state.
I just want to talk with some inteligent and responsive about things we need no to conciliate.
Bookmarks