- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 Friends With Benefits  Movie Review Friends With Benefits  Movie Review
			
				
					Cast: Justin Timberlake, Mila Kunis, Patricia Clarkson, Jenna Elfman 
 
 I came to Friends With Benefits with the hope that writer-director  Will Gluck would take aim at the romantic comedy with the same piquant,  mischievous zeal he displayed in 2010’s Easy A, a film that earned him  comparisons to such hallowed figures as Alexander Payne and John Hughes.  And he does—for a while, at least. The film springs from the gate with a  fun revisionist élan, promising to lay waste to the stale conventions  that have long characterized the genre. A promise that, in the end, is  sadly unfulfilled.
 
 
 Attractive twentysomethings Dylan (Justin Timberlake) and Jamie (Mila  Kunis) first meet as business associates—he’s a savvy web designer,  she’s a spunky headhunter who lures him to New York to work for GQ. Both  happen to be recovering from nasty breakups (he was dumped by a Jon  Mayer obsessive, played by Emma Stone; her by a cloying slacker, played  by Andy Samberg), and they bond over their shared exasperation with  relationships and romance.
 
 
 One night, wallowing in their mutual malaise over beer and pizza and  an insipid rom-com (a fictitious film-within-a-film featuring uncredited  Jason Segel and Rashida Jones), they hit on an idea: Why not use each  other to sate our primal urges, without all the hassles and  complications that committed relationships entail?
 
 
 The pack is formalized by an oath sworn over a iPad bible app (the  film is gratuitously tech-chic, to the point of employing flash mobs as  plot devices), and consummated in one of the film’s funniest scenes.  Freed from any pretensions of romance, and from any fears of  embarrassment or rejection, they approach the act from the perspective  of two people seeking only to maximize their enjoyment. (He encourages  her to look at it as a game of tennis.) They calmly recite their  preferences, idiosyncrasies, and deal-breakers, like agents negotiating a  contract; during the deed, they critique each others’ performance with  utter candor, offering helpful guidance when it’s called for.
 
 They’re hanging out, they’re having sex; the only thing missing,  obviously, is intimacy. It’s inevitable—at least in the peculiar moral  universe inhabited by studio rom-coms—that one or both of them will come  to crave it. And that’s when complications arise, both for Dylan and  Jamie and for the filmmakers. Faced with two roads, Gluck opts to take  the more-traveled one, and Friends With Benefits gradually—and  disappointingly—yields to convention, affirming many of the rom-com  tropes and clichés it initially seemed intent on skewering.
 
 
 
 
 Keywords:Justin Timberlake, Mila Kunis, Patricia Clarkson, Jenna Elfman,Alexander Payne,John Hughes,Emma Stone,cloying slacker,  Andy Samberg,ason Segel , Rashida Jones,Friends With Benefits  ,Movie Review
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Tags for this Thread
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
				 Posting Permissions
				Posting Permissions
			
			
				
	
		- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-  
Forum Rules
 
			 
		 
	 
 
  
   
  
 
	
 
Bookmarks